Intense sweeteners have no proven nutritional value, says French authority

By Annie Harrison-Dunn

- Last updated on GMT

There is not enough conclusive evidence to justify recommending intense sweeteners as a sugar replacement, says the French food agency
There is not enough conclusive evidence to justify recommending intense sweeteners as a sugar replacement, says the French food agency
Recommending intense sweeteners as a way to reduce sugar intakes cannot be justified as a public health strategy, the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES) has concluded. 

In its assessment, ANSES said there was currently no conclusive evidence for the beneficial effects of intense sweetener consumption on the incidence of type 2 diabetes, blood sugar management for diabetics, sweetness perception or weight management.

“This sugar intake reduction is to be achieved by the overall reduction in the sweet taste of food, and from an early age. As such, ANSES recommends that beverages with sweeteners and sugar are not a substitute for water consumption.”

It said sweetener consumption had increased sharply over the last 20 years perhaps due to concerns around obesity, but there had yet to be an overall assessment of the possible risks and nutritional benefits of such products in Europe.

It also concluded that accusations of associated risks like the development of cancer, type 2 diabetes and preterm birth were also currently unsubstantiated.

It said further research on both the possible pros and cons was warranted.

Prove it

It said the replacement of sugar with intense sweeteners caused in most cases a lower short-term energy intake through lower calorie intake. However, current data failed to document what the long-term effect of that might be and whether this effect was maintained.

Natural_sweeteners

On weight control, ANSES said studies in adults and children had reported conflicting results – while some even saw a paradoxical association with weight gain, although the reason behind had not been established.

There was no evidence for the benefit of regular consumption of sweeteners as a sugar replacement on glycaemic control for diabetics, and this had not been proven to help prevent the onset of type 2 diabetes.

Key gaps in research

ANSES said more research was needed on consumption among children and what this might mean for the development of taste, food preferences and intake control. The impact for other specific populations like pregnant women and diabetics has also been under-reported, and in particular the risks for these groups should be investigated.

For the general population research should focus on weight management, it said.  

In France, the most common intensive sweeteners were aspartame, acesulfame K and sucralose.

The full opinion in French can be found here​. An English version of the opinion is due to be available by the end of this week. 

Related news

Related products

show more

Sweeten Your Treats with Sustainable Syrups

Sweeten Your Treats with Sustainable Syrups

Content provided by Green Plains Inc. | 09-Sep-2024 | Insight Guide

Elevate your products with Green Plains’ premium, low carbon-intensity corn syrups. Drop-in replacements with an up to 40% lower carbon footprint than...

Tap into the potential of better-for-you candy

Tap into the potential of better-for-you candy

Content provided by Valio | 08-May-2024 | White Paper

The confectionery industry is responding to the trend toward indulgent yet healthier sweets. Explore our Valio Bettersweet™ white paper to learn more about...

Satisfy Your Sweet Tooth with Sustainable Syrups

Satisfy Your Sweet Tooth with Sustainable Syrups

Content provided by Green Plains Inc. | 05-Apr-2024 | Infographic

Elevate your products with Green Plains’ premium, low carbon-intensity corn syrups. Drop-in replacements with an up to 40% lower carbon footprint than...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars